How was the national income tax different from state taxes during the Progressive Era? OA State taxes were used by the government to fund programs and policies to benefit the people whereas the national income tax was used to benefit each individual state, ов. State taxes took a percentage of individuals and corporate earnings whereas the national income tax could be levied on goods and services, C. National Income tax took a percentage of individuals income or corporate earnings to fund government programs, whereas state taxes could be levied where the state saw fit, OD D. National income tax imposed a flat Income tax on incomes above a certain amount, whereas state taxes took a percentage depending on the amount an individual or corporation made.

since most of current immigration into the u.s., both legal and illegal, is coming from latin america. it would be very difficult to imagine or rationalize a country my fellow citizens are trying desperately to flee into, would pose a threat to my prosperity or freedom. since the u.s. has a long history of intervention, but no record of permanent occupation, i would not feel oppression is the main objective.  

the largest free trade nation, along with the largest gdp in the world wanting to expand it's economic policy on us, and including us, could only be positive. the u.s. government has no interest in, or way of simply forcing american culture on us. and has no track record of it. other nations that adopted american social culture, or "americanization" did so voluntarily, mainly through the choice of allowing american businesses and u.s. citizens to come into their nations, as free operatives.

i believe your answer is d)

about 3,040,000 results (1.57 seconds)

explanation:

"o" (and any subsequent words) was ignored because we limit queries to 32 words.