2.What does Warren Binford mean by balancing "rights to protection" with "rights to participation"?

3.Why does Jeffrey Arnett think it’s ironic that driving

is one of the first adult privileges Americans get?

4.What event helped spur the lowering of the voting

age to 18 from 21?

whos? i don't..

Explanation:

its perfect how it was

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.