Is James Horn's assertion that "Jamestown also presents two sides of America's founding. On the one hand, England's New World offered many settlers opportunities for social and economic advancement unthinkable at home, while on the other,
colonization unleashed powerful destructive forces that were catastrophic for Indian peoples, whose lands were taken by colonists,
and for enslaved Africans and their posterity, whose labor enabled Jamestown, and indeed America, to flourish" true? Why or why
not?

he ottoman empire established islam as its guiding religion, government, and laws

in february 1787, congress decided that a convention should be convened to revise the articles of confederation, the nation’s first constitution. in may, 55 delegates came to philadelphia, and the constitutional convention began. debates erupted over representation in congress, over slavery, and over the new executive branch. the debates continued through four hot and muggy months. but eventually the delegates reached compromises, and on september 17, they produced the u.s. constitution, replacing the articles with the governing document that has functioned effectively for more than 200 years.

the main reason the us senate rejected the treaty of versailles was because "european nations wanted to punish germany"

d(:

me and mark as brainliest.

cornfield (filler filler filler filler ignore this filler filler)