The principal-agent relationship between a group of voters and their representative can sometimes be imperfect. More to the point, a representative
could decide to go against the wishes of voters on a regular basis. Why is this an inherent risk of the relationship?
The interests of the agent and the principal may not be well aligned.
Principals can force agents to do things against their will so much that the agents rebel.
Agents and principals in this relationship can both be irrational at times.
Voters are often ignorant about the ins and outs of major issues, giving representatives the moral duty to decide for them.
Answers: 1
History, 21.06.2019 19:00
Which piece of legislation signed by lyndon johnson brought an end to barriers preventing minorities from participating in elections?
Answers: 1
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
How does iraqs geographical location ( desert-like environment ) affect it's politcal relationships? i've been stuck on this and i'm giving a lot of points
Answers: 1
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
Put the following events in the correct chronological order: i. new state constitutions are formed. ii. declaration of independence is signed. iii. second continental congress writes the articles of confederation. iv. special conventions are convened to produce fundamental laws for the states. a. ii, iii, iv, i b. ii, iv, i, iii c. ii, i, iv, iii d. ii, i, iii, iv
Answers: 3
The principal-agent relationship between a group of voters and their representative can sometimes be...
Mathematics, 12.10.2019 10:50
English, 12.10.2019 10:50
English, 12.10.2019 10:50
Chemistry, 12.10.2019 10:50
Social Studies, 12.10.2019 10:50
Health, 12.10.2019 10:50
English, 12.10.2019 10:50
Mathematics, 12.10.2019 10:50
Biology, 12.10.2019 10:50
History, 12.10.2019 10:50
Biology, 12.10.2019 10:50