subject
History, 15.01.2022 02:50 juanesmania

How did supporters of US imperialism justify the nation's actions in the South Pacific during the 20th century? * They argued that it was the United States' responsibility to provide international security in the Eastern Hemisphere
They argued that it was the United States' duty to spread its political and cultural beliefs and institutions to other nations.
They argued that containing the spread of communist ideology outweighed the cost of US military intervention in the region.
They argued that the United States must compete with European nations for resources in order to protect its economic interests.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:30
How does iraqs geographical location ( desert-like environment ) affect it's politcal relationships? i've been stuck on this and i'm giving a lot of points
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:30
Which of the following would an isolationist support?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
Which statement is true of both presidential and parliamentary systems of government?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
Plz which of the following statements about spanish plantations is not accurate? a. spanish plantations grew sugarcane for export to spain b. the spanish had little concerned for the lives of the indians who worked on the plantations. c. spanish plantations grew wide variety of crops and center produce to many different european countries. d. to replace the native americans our dying off the spanish imported african slaves.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
How did supporters of US imperialism justify the nation's actions in the South Pacific during the 20...
Questions
question
Physics, 01.08.2021 20:50
question
Mathematics, 01.08.2021 20:50
Questions on the website: 13722362