Why did the north have more capital than the south? the north made more money on its farm produce. the south did not produce any goods to sell in trade. the south had its capital tied up in land and slaves. the north spent less money on industrialization.

The South had its capital tied up in land and slaves.

The United States had two very different economies prior to the Civil War. On the one hand, the North was dedicated to a variety of industries, such as manufacturing, finance and commerce. Employees and employers operated under a wage system. However, in the South, the economy was mostly focused on staple crops produced by slave labor. The South's most important crop was cotton, which required more than 4 million African slaves for its production.

The fact that the South had its capital tied up in land and slaves meant that it could not be used as easily as the capital of the North. Moreover, these assets were subject to disruption during the war, as the land was destroyed and the slaves were freed. The Reconstruction period would therefore be more beneficial to the North than to the South.

i believe the answer is:

-   william jennings bryan is a democrat while mckinley was a republican

at that time, the segment of population that choose for democratic party were the voters with low economic background and vice versa

- william jennings has support of populists and wants to have inflation to farmers while mckinley has support of bankers and businessmen , doesn't want inflation

the fixed value of gold make the large business able to stack up their gold without   being worried that it would devaluated.

- william jennings supported the silver standard while mckinley supported the gold standard

according to jenning, using other metal beside gold could the poor people to have more purchasing power and them advance in the society.

i believe the answer is a