History, 01.07.2019 00:30 xxaurorabluexx

What are the advantages and disadvantages of the mercator projection?

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Advantages:

The two properties, conformality and straight rhumb lines, make this projection uniquely suited to marine navigation: courses and bearings are measured using wind roses or protractors, and the corresponding directions are easily transferred from point to point, on the map, with the help of a parallel ruler or a pair of navigational protractor triangles.

Disadvantages:

Mercator projection distorts the size of objects as the latitude increases from the Equator to the poles, where the scale becomes infinite. So, for example, Greenland and Antarctica appear much larger relative to land masses near the equator than they actually are.

Answer from: gwendallinesikes

The advantages are that it is good for naval crossings and preserves the shapes.

Answer from: Quest

propriety is the answer. hope this !

explanation:

Answer from: Quest

congress seems to have some powers the states do not have. they can do some pretty big things, they can declare war. and they can lead armies and navies. they also have the power to create a mail delivery system, make foreign treaties, print and borrow money, (both states and congress can do that)and make rules for certain places, i think they said the western states.

the new government has been a big to growing their country! they are getting new land over west. and they are passing laws which to settle boundary issues.

although most of this information sounds good for them, bad for us, there are some weaknesses from their plan. the people are still having issues with taxes and trading goods, they also don't have a main leader such as a chief or a president. they also have trouble with currency. the states are printing out so much money the national currency is beginning to be worthless. so things are getting hard to handle over here.

some of the americans like the new government and think that even if they could ask about changing it they would be ignored. daniel shays got a group of people who hated the new government and decided to attack. this could become either worse or better.

(one-paragraph analysis)

i think that they may start a war or some sort of big attack to make them change their government. most americans just don't want to discuss it. but i think that daniel man will speak up for them. if they do scare them they will get a better government and be able to deal with their issues better! i think that is what is going to happen next in the u.s., sincerely

lorelei hope this i had some from the internet u can report me if u want

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 17:00

According to the qianlong emperor, why was china not interested in importing anything else?

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 21:30

The political, economic, or cultural environment that surrounds an event provides the event with its

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 07:50

What is the main difference between primary and secondary sources? a. primary sources are historical documents, and secondary sources are modern-day documents. b. primary sources are derived from museums and archives, and secondary sources are created by history students and academics. c. primary sources are found in ancient places with a rich history, and secondary sources are found in historical journals and blogs. d. primary sources are created during a particular historical era, and secondary sources are created by studying primary sources.

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 08:00

Instead of being thirteen republics, under a federal head, [the federalists’ plan] is clearly designed to make us one [unified] government. . whether such a change can ever be [made] in any manner; whether it can be [made] without convulsions and civil wars; whether such a change will not totally destroy the liberties of this country—time only can determine. –the federal farmer what best summarizes the point of view the excerpt expresses? in time, one unified government will run the country. the federalists prefer thirteen republics to one unified government. one unified government probably will not lead to disruptions and civil wars. under one unified government, people will be robbed of their freedoms.