In the scott v. sandford case, sandford argued that a. an enslaved person in a free state should be granted freedom. b. a person’s property can’t be taken away without due process. c. enslaved workers should not be considered property. d. enslaved workers should have the right to a trial by jury.

B. a person’s property can’t be taken away without due process.

Explanation:

Sanford contended that an enslaved individual is categorized  as property, and under the fifth amendment, an individual's property can't be taken without fair process.

i think it was because of how protected egyptian civilization was was which allowed them to evolve without much outside influence.

the answers are a b and d