How does the bill of rights differ today than their original intent in 1791?

The bill of right differs today than their original intent in terms of interpretations.

Further Explanation:

Bill of Right:

It was a replacement of the ratification of the Constitution. It drafted 10 amendments. These ten amendments showcased the personal and freedom rights of the citizen of the country. It provided the rights related to the voting, freedom and it limited the power of the state government.

The main aim of the introduction of the Bill of Rights:

It was introduced as a set of first ten amendments for the citizen of the country. It was considered as a replacement of the Articles of Confederation. The main aim of the Bill of Rights was to limit the unreasonable power of the state government and granted citizens legal rights and relation with the government. Following are ht brief summary of the ten amendments:

The First Amendment: It gave the right of freedom, speech, religion, press and redress a grievance.

The Second Amendment: It gives the right to possess weapons.

The Third Amendment: It gives the rights to the citizens to deny the use of their house by the soldiers.

The Fourth Amendment: It limits the power of the government to search the property of the citizens.

The Fifth Amendment: It provides safety to the citizens who are accused of crimes.

The Sixth Amendment: It provides the right to a trial in a criminal case.

The Seventh Amendment: It provides the jury trial.

The Eighth Amendment: It prohibits unfair justice and punishment.

The Ninth Amendment: It states the citizens have other rights then defined above.

The Tenth Amendment: It states that the government has limited powers.

Bill of Right today:

The meaning of bill of right has not changed but the interpretation of the bill of right has changed. The interpretation of the ten amendments has changed from its drafting to now. The second amendment states that a citizen can possess weapons but the number of weapons holds by a person is a question of concern. As per the Fifth, Sixth, Seventh and Eighth amendment, the citizen has the due process right. But these rights are not given to the prisoners in places such as Cuba.  

Now, freedom of speech does not mean public speaking. It includes freedom of speech over the internet. Therefore, the change in the time and the condition has resulted in the change in the interpretation of the bill of right.

Thus, the bill of right differs today than their original intent in terms of interpretations.

Learn more:

1.Learn more about the first amendment

1.Learn more about the creation of the government  

2.Learn more about article II

Answer details:  

Grade: Middle School

Subject: History

Chapter: USA Legislature

Keywords: How, bill, rights, differ, today, than, their, original, intent, 1791.

The Bill of Rights differs today in comparison to 1791 because the interpretation of the first ten amendments has evolved.

Further Explanation:

Originally ratified in 1791, the Bill of Rights consists of the first ten amendments of the US Constitution. The goal in establishing this Bill of Rights is to list certain protections that all American citizens should possess. This includes protections like:

A) Freedom of speech

B) Freedom of religion

C) Protection against illegal search and seizures

D) Right to bear arms

E) Right to peacefully assemble

F) Right to petition the government

Even though these are the same rights that citizens still have today, the way we interpret these rights has changed. For example, today freedom of speech is not limited solely to speech in public. This idea also applies to the internet and social media websites.

When the Bill of Rights was first ratified, there was no way these individuals could predict the technological advancements and the creation of social media. So as time passes, the way we understand these rights adapts and changes to our current society.

Learn More:

Purpose of the Bill of Rights-

Key Details:

Topics: Bill of Rights, US Constitution

Grade Level: 7-12

Keywords: Bill of Rights, US Constitution, original intent, Interpretation of the Constitution

the correct answer for this question is this one: - the types of locations that were chosen for internment camps is that conducive for training and safe from any immediate attacks.

- the government choose these locations because it is cheaper and way safer than any other locations.hope this answer your question and have a nice day ahead.

hope this

answer: c

explanation:

its just the right answer