subject
History, 21.07.2019 10:00 lpierce35

Use the statement below to answer the following question: the skulls of early human-like creatures were much larger in size than the skulls of modern-day humans. how would a historian most likely describe this statement? a.)it is truthful because comparisons of the two skull types provide proof. b.)it shows bias because determining the size of an object is an opinion. c.)it is a fact because the writer is a modern-day human. d.)it shows neither fact nor opinion.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 20:30
Why did roosevelt support a “europe first” strategy even though it had been japan that had first attacked the united states?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:30
Which answer best describes an advantage of shipping goods by canal? a) most towns would rather have canals then noisy railroads b) goods could travel very fast downstream in the canal system c) traveling by boat is a much more relaxing way to transport goods. d) heavy loads of goods could travel by boat more easily then if pulled by horses.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
To what extent did mary lease's concepts of justice, freedom, and equality agree with those of samuel gompers and emilio aguinaldo? how did they compare with those of the pinkertons at homestead?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:10
What is a shocking irony about the villagers in the lottery
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Use the statement below to answer the following question: the skulls of early human-like creatures...
Questions
question
Biology, 04.06.2021 08:00
question
Mathematics, 04.06.2021 08:00
question
Mathematics, 04.06.2021 08:00
question
Health, 04.06.2021 08:00
question
Mathematics, 04.06.2021 08:00
Questions on the website: 13722359