In the 1850 dred scott case, a missouri jury ruled? that only scott, not his wife, should be free. that the scotts should be granted their freedom. that the scotts should remained enslaved. that only scott’s wife, not scott, should be free.

Dred Scott was a slave, owner existed with him in Illinois and Wisconsin territory (free) for some years, supposed this made him a free man, jury ruled in his favor, Missouri supreme court overturned the decision on the grounds that slaves could not have a right to a trial or to testify on his behalf, court also ruled that Missouri compromise was illegal and captivity could not be banned in a territory, slaves were property, fifth amendment guaranteed rights to property.

The answer is...

B-that the Scotts should be granted their freedom.

I just took the test and got 100%. I hope it helps!

a historian researching the immigration policies of the early 1900s would expect a source written today,rather than in 1910 to :

( a ) be more interested in objective data and statistics.

study of past cultures