Which of the following is not a reason why latin american economies were damaged immediately after the wars for independence? a. thousands of people died during the wars. b. factories, mines, and fields were destroyed in battles. c. other countries hesitated to invest in corrupt governments. d. spanish citizens took their money with them when they fled.

The correct answer is C) Other countries hesitated to invest in corrupt governments.

The statement that is not a reason why Latin American economies were damaged immediately after the wars for independence is "Other countries hesitated to invest in corrupt governments."

What really happened after the many wars of independence in Latin America was that thousands of people died during the wars, factories, mines, and fields were destroyed in battles, and Spanish citizens took their money with them when they fled. This left the newly independent countries in such as precarious conditions that were so difficult to overcome. Furthermore, people still felt the pain of so much loss during the war and there was not a true leader that was capable to instill the kind of political and economic reformation that helped their countries.

answer is 1935

because gandhi led a march the sea in 1930 and 5 years later he did it again

hello!

according to the passage the most suitable options are two. the first one is "by leading the aef to victory in several key battles" like the battle of saint- mihiel and the battle of cantigny mentioned in the passage you copied here. the second one is "by the aef and allied forces defeat germany" since the passage says that his army destroy the german resistance in the meuse- argonne offensive. and also, "by insisting that the aef operate as an independent force".

hope this