subject
History, 02.08.2019 01:50 nosugh

Laws permitting, and even requiring, their separation in places where they are liable to be brought into contact do not necessarily imply the inferiority of either race to the other, and have been generally, if not universally, recognized as within the competency of the state legislatures in the exercise of their police power. how does this relate to the premises of brown v. board of education? the brown case addresses whether state legislatures are equipped to judge the quality of education offered at segregated schools. the brown case addresses whether authorities believe that one race is inferior to another when creating public schools. the brown case addresses whether these laws inherently deny certain citizens equal protection under the law. the brown case addresses the legality of using police power to monitor public places separated by race.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 17:00
Which plan proposed to maintain open trade between china and western nations? open door policy national sovereignty missionary diplomacy salutary neglect
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 17:30
In which country did king john rule as an absolute ruler?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 19:50
Which of the following two groups did not do battle with the romans? select all that apply.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
Historians sometimes rely on video recordings in researching past events because
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Laws permitting, and even requiring, their separation in places where they are liable to be brought...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 30.10.2020 23:50
question
Chemistry, 30.10.2020 23:50
question
Mathematics, 30.10.2020 23:50
question
Chemistry, 30.10.2020 23:50
question
Health, 30.10.2020 23:50
Questions on the website: 13722367