When analyzing a source historians want to remain in other words they don’t want to be by personal feelings and opinions

When historians analyze the source they use to write and develop a historical theme, event or process, they try to remain objective. This is not easy to achieve, since historically sources should be explored to judge to what extent this source is objective, when it was written, who wrote it, under what conditions and in what kind of environment. All this in order that the analysis and implementation of the given source in the work of the historians will be representative and accurate, in other words to avoid bias, ie they want to be unbiased by personal feelings and opinions.

although the crusades failed to capture jerusalem, they had several major impacts on western europe. they increased the authority of the king: sometimes nobles died in battle without leaving an heir in which case the king got their land. kings passed taxes to pay for the crusades.

what if dreaming is our natural state, and we only wake to collect information for our dreams.

if we were to fully devote our bodies, minds, and consciousness to dreaming, how far would it go? we could essentially reach a new plain of existence were we here in these bodies are sleeping, but an entire universe of endless possibilities, happening right in our head.

that could be the way we reach some of these scientific feats that we all seem to want. we could connect to many other things. that could be the way we connect to extra-terrestrial, and even spirits of the dead.

dreaming is something that humans take for ranted, when really, it could be the key to the universe.