Why was the glorious revolution in england unusual in comparison to political developments in france, spain, and russia?

while the french, spanish, and russian monarchies were becoming more absolute, the glorious revolution created a limited monarchy.
the glorious revolution is the only instance in which the line of succession of a monarchy was altered by warfare.
unlike most revolutions, one monarch willingly ceded power to another monarch.
the glorious revolution resulted in an elected republic, unique in europe at the time.

1)if a revolution merely replaces one authoritarian ruler with another, is it still a a revolution? a turning point? 2) “the great events of history have a way of defying ideological manipulation”, according to serge schmemann, a pulitzer prize winning journalist. do you agree, why or why not? other thoughts?

Match the events to the impact they had on africa during the late 19th century 1.colonization of the congo 2.berlin conference of 1884 3.berlin act of 1885 settled tutorial disputes between european nations prohibited the slave trade in africa marks the beginning of scramble for africa

The maps below show the middle east. which best explains how the green areas depicted in the image on the left are reflected in the population map on the right? populations are greater in fertile areas that are close to freshwater sources, which is why more people live near deserts. populations are greater in fertile areas that are close to freshwater sources, which is why more people live near oceans. populations are greater in fertile areas that are close to freshwater sources, which is why more people live near mountains. populations are greater in fertile areas that are close to freshwater sources, which is why more people live near rivers.