History, 01.08.2019 06:30 jessicap7pg75

How were territorial expansion and the issue of slavery related in the united states?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Every time we added land the issue about if and when the area became a state was important. There was a balance in Washington and Congress between slave holding states and non-slave holding states (free states). The lawmakers from the free states were trying to eliminate slavery but couldn't manage to, so they instead tried to contain it. The Missouri Compromise contained it to any area south of the 36 30 parallel. Later they will attempt to keep it out of any lands won from the Mexican War with the Wilmot Proviso. These will all be over turned later with the Kansas-Nebraska Act that will state that the people living in the area should decide the matter themselves. This meant all open territory could be slave holding states. This would greatly increase their power and influence on politics in Washington.

Answer from: Quest

Italy had political stability, wealth, and trade.

Answer from: Quest

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 15:30

Which statement is an example of direct democracy? a) people elect a senator to the u.s. congress. b) the town council approves funding for a new high school. c) the president issues an executive preventing states from executing prisoners. d) voters approve an amendment allowing elderly people to pay nothing in property tax.

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 21.06.2019 23:30

How did patrick henry‘s word i am not a virginian but an american symbolism importance of the first continental congress

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 01:30

During the era of european expansion, what was the biggest reason for spain’s push for exploration?

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 02:00

The french revolution began less than two decades after the american revolution. in many ways, the american experience was an inspiration for the citizens of france. but the people of the two countries had different situations and had different concerns, which influenced the way each revolution began, progressed, and ended. in this assignment you will write an essay that compares and contrasts the two revolutions. in your essay, include information on the economic, political, or social conditions that were present; events that took place as each revolution progressed; and the final outcome of each. did the people achieve their original goals? did their goals change? were they satisfied with the outcome or did conditions worsen? to begin, consider the characteristics of each country, such as the following: • the status of ordinary citizens before the revolution • the type of government in place • the ability of the citizens to participate in their governance • the people who stepped forward as leaders • the taxes, laws, or social structure in place at the time • the outcome of the revolution compared to its original goals