subject
History, 01.08.2019 05:00 jkirby29

"it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule. if two laws conflict with each other, the courts must decide on the operation of each." —chief justice john marshall, 1803 which conclusion can be drawn from this excerpt of the supreme court's decision in marbury v. madison? a) the jurisdiction granted to the judicial branch is limited to federal and constitutional laws. b) this decision established the concept of judicial review and strengthened the role of the judicial branch. c) this decision gave congress the authority to charter the national bank, which angered the anti-federalists. d) this decision strengthened the "elastic clause" of the u. s. constitution and expanded the powers of congress.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 19:20
Which best describes colonial shipping activity in the port of charles town
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:30
Which areas where seperated by the iron curtain
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 16:30
Iknow this lets see if you do i am 6 my sister is half my age,now i am 60 how old is my sister
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 20:40
Which statement best completes the diagram
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
"it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. those w...
Questions
question
History, 06.05.2020 03:15
question
Mathematics, 06.05.2020 03:15
question
Biology, 06.05.2020 03:15
question
Mathematics, 06.05.2020 03:15
Questions on the website: 13722359