The anti-federalists were against publishing the “federalist papers.” a bill of rights. states’ rights granted in the constitution. ratification of the constitution.

ratification of the Constitution. its not C its D.

Ratification of the Constitution

Explanation:

The newly proposed constitution back then in the 18th century, supported by the Federalists, outlined the powers of the three branches of the government, established relations among state government, the process to amend the constitution, to ratify it and general and miscellaneous provisions. However, it met with the rejection of the Anti-federalists (who leaned to give more power to the states and the people) as it failed to have a bill of rights that explicitly guaranteed the protection of people's rights such as the right to freedom of speech, press, and religion.

The Anti-federalists were against its ratification because they feared that without a Bill of Rights, the government would abuse from its power and  social injustices would occur.

citizens united v. federal election commission, case in which the u.s. supreme court on january 21, 2010, ruled (5–4) that laws that prevented corporations and unions from using their general treasury funds for independent “electioneering communications” (political advertising) violated the first amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech. in so doing the court invalidated section 203 of the federal bipartisan campaign reform act of 2002 (bcra)—also known as the mccain-feingold act for its sponsors, sen. john mccain and sen. russ feingold—as well as section 441(b) of the federal election campaign act of 1971 (feca), which the bcra had amended. the court also overturned in whole or in part two previous supreme court rulings: austin v. michigan chamber of commerce (1990) and mcconnell v. federal election commission (2003).

immediately perceived as historically important, the decision generated intense controversy outside the court. some hailed it as a resounding victory for freedom of speech, while others criticized it as an overreaching attempt to rewrite campaign finance law. among the critics was pres. barack obama, who remarked in his state of the union address in the house of representatives one week later that the decision would “open the floodgates for special interests…to spend without limit in our elections.” his criticism provoked one of the supreme court justices in attendance, samuel a. alito, to break decorum by mouthing the words “not true.”

explanation:

affirmative action refers to the policies that take gender, race, or ethnicity into account in order to promote equal opportunity.

employers subject to title vii are prohibited from taking race or sex into account in any employment decisions. aa is a penalty for having any job group substantially statistically "underutilized" in any race or either sex. the employer must take steps to eliminate the underutilization, then stop, ending its aa efforts