How was the outcome of the munich agreement similar to the outcome of adolf hitler's nonaggression agreement with stalin?   a. both agreements were broken when germany attacked protected territories.  b. both agreements undermined the alliance between germany and italy.  c. both agreements allowed czechoslovakia to maintain independence from germany.  d. both agreements caused the united states to develop more friendly relations with germany.

The best answer is, A. Both agreements were broken when Germany attacked protected territories. 

Prior to the state of World War II, Nazi Germany negotiated appeasement policies with the European nations, this included the Munich Agreementment between Germany, England, and France which allowed for small territories of Czechoslovakia to be annexed to Germany.  Initially, Hitler was pleased with the diplomatic victory, though this was not the end goal, and he soon violated this agreement by invading the remainder of the country with military personnel. This action left the leaders of Western Europe uncertain of Europe's peaceful future and suspicious of Hitler. 
Outside of Western Europe Hitler also addressed concerns in the east raised by the Soviet Union and its military capabilities. As as a result, Hitler and Stalin signed the Soviet Non-Aggression Pact which called for peace between the nations and negotiated the division of European territories following their expansion plans. However, Hitler also violated this agreement leaving Stalin incapacitated with shock when Nazi Germany began Operation Barbarossa, a massive invasion of the Soviet Union. 

Upheld the 1st amendment according to the u.s constitution. freedom of speech being limited in this case yes national emergencies

The answer b is correct on edgenuity