How did the compromise of 1850 address the question of slavery in washington, d. c? -slavery was abolished in washington. d. c -the slave trade was allowed to continue in washington, d. c -slavery continued in washington, d. c, but slave trading was banned -there were no slaves in the nation's capital

-The slave trade was allowed to continue in Washington, D.C

Explanation:

Finally, and most controversially, a Fugitive Slave Law was passed, requiring northerners to return runaway slaves to their owners under penalty of law. The Compromise of 1850 overturned the Missouri Compromise and left the overall issue of slavery unsettled.

what the question i might be able to

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.