Starting in 2001, whistleblower harry markopolos alerted the sec three times to the likelihood that bernard madoff was running a ponzi scheme. why do you think the sec didn't act on this information until 2006

The SEC claimed that they didn't act because they were understaffed and overwhelmed

Explanation:

Markopolos repeatedly informed the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) about Madoff´s massive Ponzi scheme. In 2000, 2001, and 2005 the SEC disregarded his claims or merely gave his evidence a cursory investigation.

The SEC has claimed that at the time they didn't respond properly due to a lack of staff. It´s also believed that some filings were ignored because Markopolos was working for a competitor to Madoff's firm.

fmr1 gene that can lead to fragile x-associated disorders.

explanation:

you work at weenie hut juniors if you answer this question