Chenoweth and stephan examine three cases where violent and nonviolent resistance was used in campaigns in southeast asia. why were these three cases selected?

The 3 cases were decided for a few reasons however with the end goal of this task I will list four of the principle contributing variables. The principal factor was the issue that was being crusaded against keeping in mind the end goal to misuse the variety of battle objectives exhibit, the Philippines and Burma were hostile to administration cases and East Timor was a crusade against outside occupation. Second, these cases speak to both fruitful and fizzled peaceful crusades. Third, the case choice was driven by a "most-comparative" casestudy plan, in which each case was contrasted with crusades inside a similar district amid a similar era. Likewise, none of the crusades that were inspected gotten outside material aidfrom a state support, enabling the creators to hold this as a consistent factor while analyzing different factors in seclusion

It's poopjrjrkkkeoeoso