Which of the following best identifies the long-term impact of policies of appeasement and neutrality? they allowed hitler to gain power and only delayed world war. they demonstrated that peace could be achieved without war. they gave western powers time to produce military equipment. they slowed hitler’s expansion into eastern europe.

They demonstrated that peace could be achieved without war.

Explanation:

The policy of appeasement is the name by which the conciliatory policy carried out by Neville Chamberlain as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom before the Second World War has been historically known.

The culminating moment of this policy was the Conference of Munich, of 1938, in which Chamberlain accepted the guarantees offered by Hitler to maintain the European balance, sacrificing of step Czechoslovakia to the German ambitions. However, on that occasion Neville Chamberlain seriously considered having avoided, and not just postponed, an armed conflict with Nazi Germany. In fact, after celebrating the Munich Accords, he flew back to Britain and when he got off the ship, Chamberlain issued a famous statement to the press gathered at the aerodrome, pointing out that the Munich Accords were the "peace for our time"; which won him applause from the British public opinion that he believed to have really avoided a war.

The subsequent invasion of Poland in 1939, less than a year after the Munich Accords, ended up discrediting the policy of appeasement, which led to the defeat of Chamberlain in a vote of no confidence in the House of Commons in May 1940, against Winston Churchill, who had been very harsh in his criticism of Chamberlain after his agreements with Hitler, despite the fact that both were members of the Conservative Party.

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.

the decreasing neutrality of the u. s. in world war i

hope this : )