Sandra menefee sued geographic expeditions, inc. (geoex), for the wrongful death of her son while on a geoex expedition up mount kilimanjaro. geoex moved to compel arbitration under the parties’ limitation of liability contract. geoex designed its arbitration clause to limit the plaintiffs’ recovery and required them to indemnify geoex for its legal costs and fees if they unsuccessfully pursued any claim covered by the release agreement. moreover, geoex required that plaintiffs pay half of any mediation fees and arbitrate in san francisco, geoex’s choice of venue, as opposed to the plaintiffs’ home in colorado. should the court require the menefees to arbitrate? if any component of the arbitration clause is found to be unconscionable, should the court simply sever the objectionable provision and enforce the remainder of the arbitration clause? [lhotka v. geographic expeditions, inc., 104 cal. rptr. 3d 844 (cal. app. 2010)]

vehicle inspection tests are conducted to ensure that a vehicle is safe to operate. during the vehicle inspection test, you will be expected to explain or show your knowledge of the vehicle inspection process.

during the vehicle inspection test, you must show that the vehicle is safe to drive. you will have to walk around the vehicle and point to or touch each item and explain to the examiner what you are checking and why. you will not have to crawl under the hood or under the vehicle. the brake lights, emergency flashers, turn signals, and horn must be checked. if any of these items do not work, the skills and road portions of the test will be postponed.

your answer would be a. true

answer:

maryland

explanation:

in order to appeal you must be able to show why the mark or classification you are appealing against is unfair, or does not represent your true academic ability. you believe your degree classification was not calculated correctly. a procedural problem over the way an exam or assessment was conducted or marked.