subject
Law, 14.04.2020 04:28 genyjoannerubiera

In Tinker v. Des Moines, why did the Supreme Court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands? Their action did not negatively influence other students. Their action was not disruptive. Their action occurred off school grounds. Their action was political speech. In Tinker v. Des Moines, why did the Supreme Court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands? Their action did not negatively influence other students. Their action was not disruptive. Their action occurred off school grounds. Their action was political speech.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Law

question
Law, 04.07.2019 09:10
How can an environmental law affect a business
Answers: 1
question
Law, 09.07.2019 05:20
How does henry’s statement reflect the idea of social contract? how does the idea of social contract protect people’s natural and individual rights
Answers: 2
question
Law, 09.07.2019 19:20
3. meena and ala are two friends. meena has a habit of using new pens almostevery day, whereas ala believes in getting a refill for her pen instead of buyinga new pen even though her friends make fun of her.a) which out of two practices would you follow and why? b) which value is ala depicting?
Answers: 1
question
Law, 10.07.2019 07:10
Which of the following is a polynomial with roots 3,5i, and -5if(x)=x^3-3x^2+25x-75f(x)=x^3-3x^2+15x-25f(x)=x^3-15x^2+25x-75f(x)=x^3-3x^2+15x-75
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In Tinker v. Des Moines, why did the Supreme Court rule in favor of the students who wore armbands?...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 13.07.2019 03:30
question
Mathematics, 13.07.2019 03:30
question
Mathematics, 13.07.2019 03:30
question
Mathematics, 13.07.2019 03:30
question
Mathematics, 13.07.2019 03:30
Questions on the website: 13722360