Based on the facts of the previous question, Jay stays in the hospital for a few days as he is recuperating. Then, a couple of weeks after he gets released from the hospital, Jay receives a bill from the hospital for $10,000 for his medical care. If this went to court, the judge would probably describe this situation as:. a. a bilateral contract, enforceable against Jay.

b. a unilateral contract, enforceable against Jay.

c. an implied contract, enforceable against Jay.

d. no contract at all. Jay should not have to pay anything.

c. an implied contract, enforceable against Jay.

Explanation:

An Implied contracts is usually between physician and a patient this contracts do not state the course of action or payment at the start or inception of the service. Example, a medical examination usually takes place the moment a patient's request for it, this tests are usually either at the patients home or at the medical facility where the doctor practices. After the examination a course of action or payment is decided. Same applies to Jay after been treated and discharged from the hospital a course of action or payment may be made.

arsonist charge

explanation:

when you light somebody's property on fire you are considered and arsonist and are charged with an arsonist charge

answer:

polo g isn't a blood he lives in chicago

explanation:

so he ain't no blood