subject
Law, 13.06.2020 18:57 Nismo3501037

In 1964, a motel owner in Atlanta restricted its clientele to white persons, three-fourths of whom were interstate travelers. U. S. government attorneys charged that this policy violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which forbids such discrimination against blacks. The trial court ordered the motel to stop refusing blacks as guests. The motel owner appealed to the U. S. Supreme Court, claiming the Civil Rights Act was unconstitutional. Was it? Why or why not? Does the federal government have the power to regulate matters that might in any way affect interstate commerce? (Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States, 379 U. S. 241)

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Law

question
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
The exclusionary rule states that if evidence is found during an illegal search, it must be destroyed immediately. cannot be admitted into consideration. can be admitted into court anyway. cannot be admitted into court unless a judge agrees.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 07.07.2019 02:10
Limbic system disorders are possible explanations for criminal behavior under_theries? a.classical b.psychoanalytic c.criminal anthropology .d biocriminiology
Answers: 1
question
Law, 07.07.2019 02:10
Cases that arent resloved through plea bargaining or by a jury trial are decided by a judge in a \an a.indicmentb.grand jury.c.arraignment d. bentch trial
Answers: 3
question
Law, 13.07.2019 03:20
Judicial review works in which of the following ways
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In 1964, a motel owner in Atlanta restricted its clientele to white persons, three-fourths of whom w...
Questions
question
Arts, 13.12.2020 06:30
question
History, 13.12.2020 06:30
question
Mathematics, 13.12.2020 06:30
question
Social Studies, 13.12.2020 06:30
Questions on the website: 13722363