PLZ HELP ASAP At Rudy's trial, a witness testifies that she heard Rudy's friend say that Rudy "enjoyed robbing people and would do it again as soon as he could." Which of the following statements about this testimony is correct? 1. A lay witness cannot testify to this under any circumstances because it's hearsay.
2. A lay witness cannot testify to this unless an exception to the hearsay rule applies.
3. A witness can testify to this because they personally know Rudy's friend.

you too

Explanation:

"quid pro quo" harassment takes place when a supervisor requires sex, sexual favors, or sexual contact from an employee/job candidate as a condition of their employment. only supervisors who have the authority to make tangible employment actions (i.e. hire, fire, promote, can commit "quid pro quo" harassment.

answer: the answer is d

explanation: the answer is d because if motorcycles are always in your blind spot and you don't see them this can result into an unwanted collision and result in serious injury or death. therefore this is not a safe skill you can use regarding motorcycles.