subject
Law, 24.09.2020 06:01 Simplytaylorgrenade

The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is, in fact, and must be regarded by the judges, as a fundamental law. It therefore belongs to them to ascertain its meaning, as well as the meaning of any particular act proceeding from the legislative body. —Alexander Hamilton,
Federalist No. 78

Which statement comes closest to summarizing the meaning of this passage?

Courts should not try to interpret the laws.
Courts should interpret laws and the Constitution.
Courts should follow the laws but not the Constitution itself.
Courts should follow the laws of the legislature.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Law

question
Law, 06.07.2019 08:10
What are the four components of a vehicles control system?
Answers: 1
question
Law, 10.07.2019 04:40
Idid a trial but its not letting me view the questions without signing me out.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 14.07.2019 05:20
What should you do when making a personal appeal to a procrastinator to change his/her work habits? a. use examples of how you were able to overcome procrastination to convince him/her to change. b. relay information you have heard from co-workers. c. do not give any personal information. d. explain how you have been personally impacted by his/her procrastination.
Answers: 2
question
Law, 15.07.2019 20:30
Which general staff member is responsible for ensuring that assigned incident personnel are fed and have communications, medical support, and transportation as needed to meet the operational objective?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts. A constitution is,...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 28.04.2021 18:30
question
English, 28.04.2021 18:30
question
Mathematics, 28.04.2021 18:30
question
Physics, 28.04.2021 18:30
question
Mathematics, 28.04.2021 18:30
Questions on the website: 13722362