subject
Law, 13.10.2020 22:01 jsushehdhdu

Twenty-nine states do not require any specific training for private security personnel. What are the arguments for and against requiring at least forty hours of training, as is the case in California and Florida?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Law

question
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
Who is the plaintiff in a criminal lawsuit
Answers: 1
question
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
Within how many days of acquiring or discovering a significant financial interest is the investigator required to submit an updated disclosure to the institution?
Answers: 3
question
Law, 03.07.2019 16:10
How would you answer this question. how could you build your practice as an educator for equity, diversity, and inclusion to avoid the oppression of marginalized populations of students?
Answers: 2
question
Law, 03.07.2019 18:10
What was the effect of the supreme court’s ruling in citizens united v. federal election commission? a. it removed limitations on corporate funding of political broadcasts. b. it removed all limits on campaign contributions by interest groups. c. it prohibited corporations and businesses from contributing to political campaigns. d. it prohibited interest groups from contributing to individual candidates.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Twenty-nine states do not require any specific training for private security personnel. What are the...
Questions
question
English, 27.08.2019 20:30
question
Social Studies, 27.08.2019 20:30
Questions on the website: 13722363