subject
Law, 13.10.2020 23:01 Dolphin56

ASAP! pls help me with these questions 1. Which of the following could be justifications for the mailbox rule.
A) The offeror should not be bound until he is aware the offer has been accepted.
B) The mailbox rule sets the default against the offeror because the offeror is master of the offer and empowered to alter it.
C) None.
D) Requiring more confirmation is a waste of social resources.

2. Which of the following methods is valid acceptance?
A) A mailed letter indicating acceptance of an option contract. The acceptance letter was lost in the mail.
B) A mailed letter indicating acceptance of a telegram marked “Highly urgent, response required immediately.”
C) None.
D) A mailed letter indicating acceptance of an offer letter. The acceptance letter was lost in the mail.

Tom mails John an offer to rebuild John’s garage. John receives Tom’s offer and sends a counteroffer by mail. A few hours after dropping the counteroffer in the mailbox John decides to accept Tom’s offer. Tom writes a new letter to accept the initial offer and drops it in the mailbox. Can Tom’s acceptance letter be valid?
A) Yes, Tom’s acceptance will be valid if John receives the acceptance before the counteroffer.
B) No, a counteroffer terminates the power of acceptance when it is sent by mail.
C) Yes, the mailbox rule means that Tom’s acceptance took place when he mailed it to John.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Law

question
Law, 07.07.2019 10:10
Amotion that asks the court to determine if there is any actual issue of material fact based on the pleadings and affidavit
Answers: 3
question
Law, 08.07.2019 03:10
John, a 34 year old father of two children, is a member of a health maintenance organization (hmo) in texas. john has made several trips to an area clinic recommended by his hmo to seek medical attention since finding blood in his bowel movements. he has been taking large amounts of aspirin for persistent headaches but did not realize that this could cause internal bleeding. john was always seen at the clinic by a physician assistant, robert m. but never by a physician. robert didn't ask john about taking any nonprescription medications. john didn't realize that he should mention his over the counter medication (aspirin) consumption. robert tells john to take an antacid preparation to control the bleeding, but does not order any tests. he tells john to return if he is not any better. two days later, john is rushed to the area emergency room with a bowel hemorrhage.1-¿what responsibility, if any, does robert have for john's emergency? 2- does the clinic have a responsibility to provide its hmo members with the services of a physician? 3- what responsibility, as a healthcare consumer, does john have for his own medical condition?
Answers: 2
question
Law, 11.07.2019 05:30
"magic" mushrooms have effects similar to those of a. lsd b. pcp c. ketamine d. none of the above
Answers: 1
question
Law, 15.07.2019 14:10
In which of the following situations must you cross at least two different streams of opposing traffic? a. changing lanes b. turning left c. turning right
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
ASAP! pls help me with these questions 1. Which of the following could be justifications for the ma...
Questions
question
Biology, 28.01.2020 23:42
Questions on the website: 13722367