A construction contractor brought a breach of contract claim in federal court against a homeowner who had hired the contractor to build an apartment over an existing garage. The action turned on the scope of the work covered by the contract. The contractor and the homeowner were the only witnesses at the bench trial, and they strongly disagreed about the scope of the work. At the end of the trial, the judge stated findings of fact on the record but never issued a written opinion. Neither party objected to the findings. The judge found in favor of the homeowner, and the contractor appealed. Is the appellate court likely to overturn the findings?
Answers: 1
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
Why is the supremacy clause considered to be the root of federalism?
Answers: 1
Law, 07.07.2019 02:10
Limbic system disorders are possible explanations for criminal behavior under_theries? a.classical b.psychoanalytic c.criminal anthropology .d biocriminiology
Answers: 1
Law, 07.07.2019 02:10
Issues involveing police searches are adressed in the amendment to the constitution a.sixth b.fourth.c.eighth d.fifth
Answers: 1
A construction contractor brought a breach of contract claim in federal court against a homeowner wh...
Chemistry, 11.02.2021 18:30
Mathematics, 11.02.2021 18:30
History, 11.02.2021 18:30
Mathematics, 11.02.2021 18:30
Mathematics, 11.02.2021 18:30
Chemistry, 11.02.2021 18:30
Mathematics, 11.02.2021 18:40
Mathematics, 11.02.2021 18:40
Physics, 11.02.2021 18:40