Due to the stiffer penalties imposed for "possession with intent" offenses, many states
forbid the inference of intent to deliver merely
on the basis of:

A. possession of a controlled substance.

B. eyewitness testimony.

C. undercover officers' testimony.

D. possession of both a substance and
paraphernalia.

D. Possession of both a substance and

paraphernalia.

Explanation:

Howdy! Many states are doing this because of the simple fact that its not all up to officer digression in regards to charging someone with PWI. So to be charged with PWI you need to have the substance and the paraphernalia to go with it.

"quid pro quo" harassment takes place when a supervisor requires sex, sexual favors, or sexual contact from an employee/job candidate as a condition of their employment. only supervisors who have the authority to make tangible employment actions (i.e. hire, fire, promote, can commit "quid pro quo" harassment.

on june 23, 1972, the president signed title ix of the education amendments of 1972, 20 u.s.c. into law. title ix is a comprehensive federal law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program or activity.