HURRY PLEASEIf private security forces are filling a need for more forces that the U. S. military does not have , why should they be considered mercenaries and so be banned during war time?
The U. S. never signed the UN treaty, making it unclear as to whether it can be enforced or not.
Mercenaries serve a purpose according to the Geneva Convention.
The U. S. sometimes needs to use security forces as mercenaries.
The UN banned it under international law.

Read Below

Explanation:

A mercenary, sometimes known as a soldier of fortune, is an individual who takes part in ... Indeed, the Geneva Conventions declare that mercenaries are not ... If they have not "in fact, taken a direct part in the hostilities" (APGC77 Art 47.b), ... to the conflict might insist that U.S. armed guards cannot be called mercenaries

answer:

they didn't want to get killed by the armed forces

explanation:

there was a lot of people there and some of the us armed forces had guns and they didn't want to die