Jim Bobb, Esq. accepted a $90,000 settlement offer on behalf of his client, Betty Lew. The payment is to be split equally by the co-defendants, Dave’s Texas Red Hots and Root-Tootin’ Root Beer. Jim Bobb’s fee agreement entitles his firm to 30% of the settlement, or $27,000. His office receives a $45,000 check from Dave’s Texas Red Hots and promptly deposits it into his Client Trust Account. He informs Betty Lew of receipt and deposit of the funds, and also informs her of certified confirmation from Root-Tootin’ Root Beer that their payment will be delivered within 14 days. Betty Lew demands that Jim Bobb send her the entire amount received from Dave’s, and to take his fee from the remaining funds when they arrive from Root Tootin’ Root Beer. Of the following actions, which could Jim Bobb properly undertake:

Which of the following statements best illustrates an argument on whether congress is effective on providing oversight of the bureaucracy? a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b. congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to show more a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b.congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to further their own interests and not necessarily the public interest. c.congress provides effective oversight of the bureaucracy through the budgetary process. d.congress is not effective in providing oversight because of the budget and enabling legislation.