subject
Law, 28.01.2021 23:40 pennstatealum

In the past, the rules of discovery were very restrictive, and trials often turned on elements of surprise. For example, a plaintiff would not necessarily know until the trial what the defendant's defense was going to be. In the last several decades, however, new rules of discovery have substantially changed this situation. Now, each attorney can access practically all of the evidence that the other side intends to present at trial, with the exception of certain information - namely, the opposing attorney's work product. Work product is not a precise concept. Basically, it includes all of the attorney's thoughts on the case. Can you see any reasons why such information should not be made available to the opposing attorney

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Law

question
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
Difference between joint tenancy and tenancy in common
Answers: 3
question
Law, 04.07.2019 02:20
The bon rules, located in title 22 of the texas administrative code, implement and reflect..
Answers: 2
question
Law, 12.07.2019 02:20
1. once you decide that it is safe to move out of traffic, what steps should you follow to ensure safe passage? 2. give some examples where it is unsafe to travel at the speed limit 3. when parking downhill with a curb, what steps would you follow with an automatic transmission? what about manual transmission? 4. what are three things you can do to safely leave a vehicle? ! its due in 3 hours! 100 points to anyone who can at least with one : (
Answers: 2
question
Law, 15.07.2019 14:10
Most collisions caused by 16-year-old drivers tend to involve . a. a temporary physical impairment b. a willfully dangerous action c. an improper visual search
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In the past, the rules of discovery were very restrictive, and trials often turned on elements of su...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 12:23
question
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 12:23
question
Chemistry, 05.05.2020 12:23
Questions on the website: 13722361