Former Major League Baseball player and radio game announcer Bob Uecker sought an injunction against Ann Ladd, alleging a six- or seven-year pattern of harassment. Ladd, who claimed to be a devoted fan, was charged with felony stalking. An injunction was issued against her bothering Uecker, but the stalking charge was dropped when she agreed to cooperate. Later, Ladd sued Uecker for defamation, claiming that Uecker defamed her in the material he filed in support of his application for the injunction. The trial court dismissed her suit, and she appealed. What do you think the outcome of her appeal was and why? [Ladd vb. Uecker, 780 N. W.2d 216 (Ct. App., Wisc., 2010).]

"quid pro quo" harassment takes place when a supervisor requires sex, sexual favors, or sexual contact from an employee/job candidate as a condition of their employment. only supervisors who have the authority to make tangible employment actions (i.e. hire, fire, promote, can commit "quid pro quo" harassment.

he was honoring the union dead and reminded the listeners of the purpose of the soldier's sacrifice: equality, freedom, and national unity.

explanation:

answer:

that is open to question, and different types of governments have certainly created a wide variety of rules. governments almost certainly originated with the need to protect people from many of which provided people with relief through jobs, payments, and food.

explanation:

answer:

explanation:

purple