subject
Law, 25.02.2021 08:10 cxmochaa

Holding The Court held the 2 Live Crew's version of the song was a ridiculing commentary on
Orbison's work and deserving of protection against the infringement charges. As long as
the work was intended as a parody and not for advertising for the group or its products, the
fact that it was a commercial success for 2 Live Crew does not bar the Crew from using the
Section 107 defense.


Holding

The Court held the 2 Live Crew's version of the song was a ridiculing commentary on
Orbis

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Law

question
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
When was virginia conflict of interest and ethics advisory council created?
Answers: 3
question
Law, 08.07.2019 05:10
What is the difference between university and college?
Answers: 2
question
Law, 09.07.2019 07:10
Do we actually do work like math, reading, etc? ?
Answers: 2
question
Law, 09.07.2019 19:20
3. meena and ala are two friends. meena has a habit of using new pens almostevery day, whereas ala believes in getting a refill for her pen instead of buyinga new pen even though her friends make fun of her.a) which out of two practices would you follow and why? b) which value is ala depicting?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Holding The Court held the 2 Live Crew's version of the song was a ridiculing commentary on
O...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 16.06.2021 14:50
question
Mathematics, 16.06.2021 14:50
question
Mathematics, 16.06.2021 14:50
question
Mathematics, 16.06.2021 14:50
question
Mathematics, 16.06.2021 14:50
Questions on the website: 13722361