1. What did you learn from this conversation? 2. What did you contribute? 3. How did you prepare for this discussion? 4. What ground rules did you and the other participants establish? How did they work? 5. What is an example of a time during the discussion when you challenged or built on an idea shared by someone else? 6. Did you disagree with a point raised during the discussion? How did you respond to it? 7. How well did you and the other discussion participants support your ideas with evidence? 8. How have your ideas about this topic changed as a result of this conversation?

Ageneral requirement for informed consent is that no informed consent may include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject’s legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language? a. your participation in this research is voluntary. if you choose not to participate, or change your mind later, your decision will not affect your relationship with the researcher or your right to other services that you may be eligible for. b. taking part in the research is voluntary, but if you choose to take part, you waive the right to legal redress for any research-related injuries. c. the researcher may stop you from taking part in this research without your consent if you experience side effects that make your emotional condition worse. if you become too emotionally distressed during the research, you may have to drop out. d. in the event of any distress you may have related to this research, you will be given access to appropriate resources.