subject
Law, 22.05.2021 15:10 ladnerhailey16

Michael incorporated Erin Homes, Inc., to manufacture mobile homes. He issued himself a stock certificate for 100 shares for which he made no payment. He and his wife served as officers and directors of the organization, but, during the eight years of its existence, the corporation held only one meeting. Erin always had its own checking account, and all proceeds from the sales of mobile homes were deposited there. It filed federal income tax returns each year, using its own federal identification number. John and Thelma paid $17,500 to purchase a mobile home from Erin, but the company never delivered it to them. John and Thelma sued Erin Homes and Michael, individually. Should the court "pierce the corporate veil" and hold Michael personally liable?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Law

question
Law, 10.07.2019 23:40
Assignment: 01.06 review and critical thinking questions criminal
Answers: 2
question
Law, 13.07.2019 03:20
Judicial review works in which of the following ways
Answers: 2
question
Law, 16.07.2019 06:10
Traffic signals at expressway on-ramps use lights.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 16.07.2019 21:40
Statute of limitations on debt collection by state
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Michael incorporated Erin Homes, Inc., to manufacture mobile homes. He issued himself a stock certif...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 11.06.2020 18:57
question
Mathematics, 11.06.2020 18:57
question
Mathematics, 11.06.2020 18:57
Questions on the website: 13722360