What is the best conclusion to draw from the difference in the United States Supreme Court's decisions in the Plessy case versus in the Brov- v. Board of Education case?
-Plessy did not have a reasonable civil-rights complaint, and Brown did.
-We have a greater moral responsibility to support the constitutional pants of children than others.
-The 14th Amendment is vague and sweeping, and so it continues to cause debate to this day.
-The way Americans interpret their constitutional rights changes over time as society changes.

so you come to the correct conclusions and make the right decision based on good judgment and a clear mind and valid thought processes behind it, and not just hasty thinking and recklessness.

explanation:

hey love i hoped this if it didn't let me know. you so much and have a wonderful day : ) keep doing the very best you can and never give up you can do it

1. should those convicted of violating laws be labeled?

-yes, because they are violating other people's human rights, so why should they get their's and other's don't?

2. do you feel that this labeling would be an infringement on a person's rights?

-yes it does technically but they lose the right to be human when they rap.e people of everything they have.

yes

explanation: