Suppose a plaintiff alleges that a North Carolina campaign-financing law violates his First Amendment (to the United States Constitution) free speech rights. This case , and it falls under jurisdiction

raises a federal question; concurrent

Explanation:

A plaintiff is a party or an individual who files a case against another party in the court of law.

The prevents the Government or the Congress to make any law that regulates the establishment of any religion or it prevents the free exercise of any religion or abridge the freedom of press or of speech and he right of people for peaceful assembly.

Concurrent jurisdiction exits where more than one court is involved and where the hearing is done in two or more courts together and simultaneously over the specific case.

In the context, a person files a case against a campaign-financing law of North Carolina stating that the law violates the plaintiffs First Amendment freedom of speech rights.

Thus his lawsuit raises a federal question and the case falls under a concurrent jurisdiction where more than one court will have jurisdiction over the case.

answer:

that sucks

explanation:

answer:

purple

explanation:

it's very specific but the exact color gives me memories and a feeling i can't explain : )