subject
Law, 14.07.2021 16:00 ericamoody14

Wendy an 86 year old womanhas recently returned from hospital following a fall in her shower at the residential care facilityin Weston Creek where she has lived since the death of her husband 12 months ago. Wendyis independent with all activities of livingand only requires a cane for support when ambulating. Staff have noticedthat over the last three monthsWendy hasbecome increasinglywithdrawn, her appetite has decreased, she is spending more time alone in her room, refusing tohaveregular showersand delaying or at times refusing to takeher medications. Four days ago, Wendyadvised staffthat she no longer wants to live and has refused all food and fluids. Wendy has lost a considerable amount of weightand appears quitemalnourished. Staff and residents have commented on her odor and appearance. Wendy’s family havedemandedthat the residential care facility take actionand use coercion or force if necessaryto ensure that Wendy has herbasic care requirements met including, ensuring adequate diet, hydrationand personal care including bathingor they will be liable for neglect and causing Wendy’s death. A multidisciplinary team meeting is to be held to discuss the case. NARRATIVE THREE (3)QUESTION: From the perspective of your discipline, identify how you would advocate for Wendyinthe team meeting. Usethe biomedical ethical principles(beneficence, non-maleficence, justice and autonomy)andrelevant legal frameworksto justify your position. NARRATIVE FOURYou have noticed that your colleagueCai, who is usually eager, engaged and full of energy, is looking withdrawn, is quiet and shut down. She has called in sick for several shifts which is out of character for her. Caiis a new graduatewholeft China fouryears ago and chose to stay in Canberra after completingher training, during this timeCai has alsocompleted her gender transition and is now legally female. Cailoves living here but misses her family who still live overseas. Caihas been working on this ward for the last 4 months. You ask Caiif she isOK and shebursts into tears. She states that her colleagues do not include her in conversations, turn and walk away when she approaches and never ask her to join them for morning tea or to get coffee. Cai claims that her colleaguescannot even pronounce her name and call her “nurse”or “the New Grad”and use the incorrect pronoun. Caireports that nursing colleagues have also started to question her clinical practice in front of peers, patients and relatives. Cai reports to you that she is starting to dread coming to work and it makes her feel anxious. She does not think there is anything she can doto improve her situationand that management would think she is over-reacting to the workplace culture. Caiis afraidthat she will not get a good reference and it could affect her chances of securing a permanentcontract after her new graduate year. NARRATIVE FOUR (4)QUESTION: Reflect upon the case study above and discussthe legal and ethical obligationsfrom multiple perspectives.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Law

question
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
Which of the following best describes the principle of informed consent as described in the belmont report? a. voluntariness, risk/benefit assessment, selection of subjects. b. comprehension, conflicts of interest, risk/benefit ratio. c. risk/benefit assessment, justification of research, comprehension. d. information, comprehension, voluntariness.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 13.07.2019 03:30
Question #22 when you approach an intersection with a green traffic light, you should choose an a. approach at a speed that will allow you to stop if the light changes. b. be ready to speed up if the light turns yellow. c. always slow down by a few miles per hour, in case you need to stop.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 15.07.2019 20:30
Which general staff member is responsible for ensuring that assigned incident personnel are fed and have communications, medical support, and transportation as needed to meet the operational objective?
Answers: 2
question
Law, 16.07.2019 16:10
Which of the following statements best illustrates an argument on whether congress is effective on providing oversight of the bureaucracy? a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b. congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to show more a. congress is very effective in providing oversight of the bureaucracy. b.congress is not very effective in providing oversight to the bureaucracy because they lack the technical expertise and they are part of the iron triangles that create a relationship with the bureaucracy and interest groups to further their own interests and not necessarily the public interest. c.congress provides effective oversight of the bureaucracy through the budgetary process. d.congress is not effective in providing oversight because of the budget and enabling legislation.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Wendy an 86 year old womanhas recently returned from hospital following a fall in her shower at the...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 28.01.2020 18:05
question
Mathematics, 28.01.2020 18:05
question
Mathematics, 28.01.2020 18:05
question
Chemistry, 28.01.2020 18:05
Questions on the website: 13722367