subject
Law, 20.07.2021 02:50 cathysilvestro

In a state court of general jurisdiction in State A, a debtor, who was a resident of State A, brought suit against a lender, who was an alien with permanent residency status in State B, for violation of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The lender waived personal jurisdiction. Under state procedural rules, venue was proper in the state court. The lender timely removed the action to the federal court for the Northern District of State A, which was the district in which the state court sat. The lender then timely moved to dismiss the action for improper venue, noting that, had the action initially been brought in federal court, the federal court for the Northern District of State A would not have had proper venue over this action. How should the court rule on this motion

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Law

question
Law, 03.07.2019 15:10
The exclusionary rule states that if evidence is found during an illegal search, it must be destroyed immediately. cannot be admitted into consideration. can be admitted into court anyway. cannot be admitted into court unless a judge agrees.
Answers: 1
question
Law, 08.07.2019 23:40
Which of the follow statements about drinking alcohol and driving is true
Answers: 1
question
Law, 09.07.2019 11:10
Continue to drink or use other drugs and drive but be more careful
Answers: 1
question
Law, 15.07.2019 14:10
Most collisions caused by 16-year-old drivers tend to involve . a. a temporary physical impairment b. a willfully dangerous action c. an improper visual search
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In a state court of general jurisdiction in State A, a debtor, who was a resident of State A, brough...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 29.10.2020 16:00
question
Mathematics, 29.10.2020 16:00
question
Computers and Technology, 29.10.2020 16:00
question
Mathematics, 29.10.2020 16:10
question
Mathematics, 29.10.2020 16:10
Questions on the website: 13722367