Jack is enjoying a day at the beach with some friends. One friend needs to run to the store for sandwiches, and Jack offers to drive. They leave their things on the beach, jumping Into Jack's Jeep. Unfortunately, as they pull onto the road, another car falls to slow down and hits them. The
other driver is upset, even though she is the one who hit Jack. When police get to the scene, she points out to the officers that Jack was driving
barefooted. "You're not supposed to do that." she cries out. She repeats what her driver's ed instructor taught her, that it might cause a driver to
slip and take their foot off the pedals. The officer acknowledges that driving without shoes might be dangerous but does not give Jack a ticket.
What is the MOST plausible reason for this?
OA Jack is friends with the officer and received special treatment.
OB. Jack has a disability and is not required to wear shoes while driving.
Ос. The other driver's actions were more dangerous, so they trump what Jack did.
OD. While driving without footwear might be dangerous, it is not illegal.