Case 8 - Escobido v. Illinois, 378 U. S.478 (1964). Danny Escobedo's brother-in-law, Manuel, was shot and killed. The police arrested and interrogated Escobedo. Escobedo asked to speak to his attorney before he answered any questions. Even though his attorney was at police headquarters waiting to talk to him, the police did not allow him to. The police continued to question Escobedo without letting him talk to his lawyer, until he confessed to the shooting. His confession was used against him at his trial. He appealed to the U. S. Supreme Court, arguing that his confession was taken from him illegally. Discussion Questions:What part of the Fifth Amendment was involved?How would the Supreme Court go about deciding the case (what would it consider)?How do you think the Supreme Court should rule, and why?

anticipatory breach of contract

as the name suggests, an anticipatory breach is a breach of contract before the time of performance. so, if a promisor denies to perform his promise and signifies his unwillingness before the time for performance, then it is an anticipatory breach of contract.

and

actual breach of contract

while an anticipatory breach is before the time of performance, an actual breach of contract is on the scheduled time of performance of the contract. an actual breach of contract can be committed either.

hope this . : )

answer:   idk sorry

explanation:

answer:

monkey

primate

descriptionmonkey is a common name that may refer to groups or species of mammals, in part, the simians of infraorder simiiformes. the term is applied descriptively to groups of primates, such as families of new world monkeys and old world monkeys. wikipedia

phylum: chordata

kingdom: animalia

lifespan: mandrill: 20 years, japanese macaque: 27 years, more

mass: rhesus macaque: 17 lbs, mandrill: 42 – 82 lbs, more encyclopedia of life

height: mandrill: 1.8 – 2.1 ft., japanese macaque: 1.9 ft., common marmoset: 7.4 in., golden lion tamarin: 10 in., olive baboon: 2.3 ft.

length: rhesus macaque: 1.7 ft., mandrill: 2.5 – 3.1 ft.,

in order to appeal you must be able to show why the mark or classification you are appealing against is unfair, or does not represent your true academic ability. you believe your degree classification was not calculated correctly. a procedural problem over the way an exam or assessment was conducted or marked.