I'm doing a debate for class and I'm having trouble think of a possible argument against mine (I want to make sure I can argue back) basically if you don't want to read the whole thing my argument is that around 2%-10% of people are wrongfully convicted and capital punishment would be killing the innocent people it's meant to protect. (my side is against capital punishment so the person responding would be for and arguing against my point)

Logical Fallacies Handlist:

Fallacies are statements that might sound reasonable or superficially true but are actually flawed or dishonest. When readers detect them, these logical fallacies backfire by making the audience think the writer is (a) unintelligent or (b) deceptive. It is important to avoid them in your own arguments, and it is also important to be able to spot them in others' arguments so a false line of reasoning won't fool you. Think of this as intellectual kung-fu: the vital art of self-defense in a debate. For extra impact, learn both the Latin terms and the English equivalents. You can click here to download a PDF version of this material.

Explanation:

arsonist charge

explanation:

when you light somebody's property on fire you are considered and arsonist and are charged with an arsonist charge

answer:

so they didn't get shot,exploded, arrested, or killed for that matter. why else? its a military base why should you want to step foot on a land-mined field? and why would you want to get shot or exploded? people may seem dumb but in reality there not, they actually thought this on trough.

explanation: