Which statement is the correct interpretation of the inequality −2 > −3? 1 on a number line, −2 is located to the left of −3. 2 on a number line, −2 is located to the right of −3. 3 on a number line, −2 is located to the left of 0 and −3 is located to the right of 0. 4 on a number line, −2 is located to the right of 0 and −3 is located to the left of 0.

The second one.

First of all, all the options involving zero make no sense, since it is not present in the inequality.

Then, the number line has a direction, which is rightwards. This means that the numbers get bigger and bigger as you walk the line to the right.

So, if , it means that is located to the right of

i think it's either c or d

step-by-step explanation: the entire question is extremely odd. 04 obviously refers to the interest rate. honestly i will say the answer is c. because the (2 x 12) part would mean it's compounded semiannually. i'll say choose c.

the answer is stop cheating on things stoopid

step-by-step explanation:

im eatin up the 44