Can someone asap daryl wrote the following proof to prove that alternate interior angles 3 and 5 are congruent. he made two errors in the proof. identify and correct the errors. steps statements justification 1. pq || rs by given2. angle 1 ≅ angle 3 by vertical angle postulate 3. angle 6 ≅ angle 8 by vertical angle postulate 4. angle 1 ≅ angle 8 by exterior angle postulate 5. angle 3 ≅ angle 5 by transitive property of equality

The errors are in steps 4 and 5. Step 4 would be that angle 1 is supplementary to angle 8, and step 5 would be that angles 3 and 5 are congruent because they are alternate interior angles.

answer: at first, in 1635, the evening meetings had been just for women . .

what relationship between ideas is shown in the text above?

question 1 options:

location of events

similarity of events

timing of events

examples of an idea

step-by-step explanation:

to find the total number of combinations, multiply the quantity of each item by each other:

2 pairs of shoes x 3 pairs of shorts = 6 different combinations.