Branden and janna are analyzing the same conditional statement. branden finds multiple examples that validate the conditional statement. janna finds one example that satisfies the hypothesis of the conditional statement, but not the conclusion. which must be true? the conditional statement is true. there are more examples that validate the statement than there are that do not. the conditional statement is true. there is at least one example that validates the statement. the conditional statement is false. there is at least one counterexample for the statement. the conditional statement is false. there must be exactly one example that valid

The appropriate description seems to be ...

The conditional statement is false. There is at least one counterexample for the statement.

Step-by-step explanation:

Branden and Janna are analyzing the same conditional statement. Branden finds multiple examples that validate the conditional statement. Janna finds one example that satisfies the hypothesis of the conditional statement, but not the conclusion.

A counterexample is a case that shows that the argument is invalid. So, there must be a counter example for the statement.

So, the answer is - The conditional statement is false. There is at least one counterexample for the statement.

when functions are first introduced, you will probably have some simplistic "functions" and relations to deal with, usually being just sets of points. these won't be terribly useful or interesting functions and relations, but your text wants you to get the idea of what the domain and range of a function are. small sets of points are generally the simplest sorts of relations, so your book starts with those.

step-by-step explanation:

state the domain and range of the following relation. is the relation a function?

{(2, –3), (4, 6), (3, –1), (6, 6), (2, 3)}

the above list of points, being a relationship between certain x's and certain y's, is a relation. the domain is all the x-values, and the range is all the y-values. to give the domain and the range, i just list the values without duplication:

domain: {2, 3, 4, 6}

range: {–3, –1, 3, 6}

(it is customary to list these values in numerical order, but it is not required. sets are called "unordered lists", so you can list the numbers in any order you feel like. just don't duplicate: technically, repetitions are okay in sets, but most instructors would count off for this.)

while the given set does indeed represent a relation (because x's and y's are being related to each other), the set they gave me contains two points with the same x-value: (2, –3) and (2, 3). since x = 2 gives me two possible destinations (that is, two possible y-values), then this relation is not a function.

note that all i had to do to check whether the relation was a function was to look for duplicate x-values. if you find any duplicate x-values, then the different y-values mean that you do not have a function. remember: for a relation to be a function, each x-value has to go to one, and only one, y-value.

state the domain and range of the following relation. is the relation a function?

{(–3, 5), (–2, 5), (–1, 5), (0, 5), (1, 5), (2, 5)}

i'll just list the x-values for the domain and the y-values for the range:

on monday rodney ate 1/4th of the sandwich = 3/12

on tuesday he ate 1/3rd of the sandwich = 4/12

therefore in total he has eaten = 3/12 + 4/12 = 7/12

thus we can say that he has eaten 7/12 of the sandwich on monday and tuesday alltogether.

happy to

pls mark as brainliest.